RGV About Dog Lovers: The most respected and controversial directors in India, Ram Gopal Varma, is known for his bold opinions and outspoken nature. He is one of the celebrated directors for his works like Satya, Company, Rangeela, and many others. He continues to stay in the limelight even if he is not making any films. With his satirical words or controversial comments on any social issues. Beyond filmmaking, RGV never hesitates to raise his voice on whatever unfolds in society, often through his signature style of satire and provocation.
In his recent tweet, he has explained briefly, addressing the dog lovers who are upset by the Supreme Court’s decision on the stray dogs. Explaining this, he has given 10 10-point explanations and even questioned the dog lovers.
Here are the 10 points raised by Ram Gopal Varma:
1. People are being bitten and killed all over by stray dogs. And dog lovers are busy tweeting about dog rights.
2. You can love your pets in your luxury homes. But it’s insensitive to preach compassion to the stray dogs and their loved ones.
3. Rich people pet Hi breeds. Poor people get mauled and killed by strays. That’s the class divide dog lovers don’t talk about.
4. If a man kills, he’s a murderer. If a dog kills, you call it an “accident.” So does that mean people killing like animals can also be called an accident?
5. You weep for dogs, but not for dead humans..I never knew Sympathy could be so selective.
Also Read: World’s Most Militarized Country: Did You Know This?
6. Instead of Dog lovers saying,“ don’t kill strays.” Why don’t you take them off the streets and adopt them all? Is it because they are low-bred, dirty, disease-oriented, or do you not want to endanger your loved ones?
7. Compassion without justice is not compassion. It’s cruelty wrapped in self-righteousness.
8. Stray dogs don’t attack inside gated communities. They attack where no gates exist.
9. A mother watches her child being bitten to death. Why don’t you create a hashtag for her, too?
Not only dogs, but maybe all animals have a right to live, but can that be at the expense of human lives ?