Shah Bano Real Case: The teaser for HAQ, a movie that was inspired by the Supreme Court’s historic ruling in the Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum case. The movie explores one of India’s most well-known court cases from the late 1970s and early 1980s, starring Yami Gautam as Bano and Emraan Hashmi as her husband. The case that continues to provoke debate in Indian society over justice, individual convictions, and secular law is depicted in the teaser.

Real Case Study of Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano Case:

The Supreme Court held on July 10 that Section 125 of the 1973 Code of Criminal Procedure allows Muslim women to ask for maintenance from their former husbands after divorce. Before this ruling, the Shah Bano case was a landmark case that set the precedent for Muslim women’s fight for equal rights in marriage and divorce cases before regular courts. It is considered to be one of the most significant legal milestones in the struggle to protect the rights of Muslim women. The judgment was a political storm and generated debate concerning how much courts should interfere with Muslim personal law, although the Supreme Court reserved the right of alimony in this specific matter.

In April 1978, 62-year-old Muslim woman Shah Bano had moved a petition in court seeking maintenance from her divorced husband, Mohammad Ahmed Khan, a prominent lawyer from Indore, Madhya Pradesh. The couple had been married in 1932 and had five children, three sons and two daughters. After years of marital tensions, Khan had requested Shah Bano to lead a separate life. In November 1978, seven months after she had moved her petition, Khan had given her an irrevocable talaq. Shah Bano then approached the court and sought maintenance under Section 125 of the 1973 Code of Criminal Procedure for herself and her five children. Under this provision, a man has the legal obligation to maintain his wife during the marriage period and even after divorce if she is not able to maintain herself. Khan denied her claim, adding that a wife is only required to pay maintenance throughout the iddat period after divorce under Muslim personal law in India.

What is iddat?

It is a waiting period, either after her husband’s death or divorce, before remarriage. It generally lasts three months, though in pregnancy, it is extended till delivery. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board, which possesses absolute powers in the muslim community and here the courts did not have the power to intervene in topics under Muslim personal law.

Also Read: Customs Raid Dulquer, Prithviraj Homes in Luxury Car Smuggling Probe

Such intervention, the Board argued, would be violative of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, which asks for courts to pass orders on divorce, maintenance, and family disputes based on Shariat. The Supreme Court of India gave its judgment in 1985 after long proceedings. Whether the provisions of the CrPC, 1973, laws that operate uniformly across all Indian citizens irrespective of religion could also be enforced in this case was the central issue. The High Court judgment granting Shah Bano maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC was subsequently confirmed by Chief Justice of India Y. Chandrachud. The maintenance amount was further increased by the Apex Court. The ruling was significant since it transcended the traditional reliance on personal law interpretations.

The case primarily emphasized gender equity in matters of marriage and divorce. The Shah Bano judgment was largely negated in 1986 when the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 was passed by the Congress government headed by Rajiv Gandhi. The husband’s liability was restricted by the new legislation to the iddat period. Court has then provided a clarification that a magistrate can direct the Waqf board to maintain the divorced lady and dependent children if she cannot maintain herself and the children. The Supreme Court has established by law very clearly that the husband’s liability could not be restricted to the iddat period alone. The case of Shah Bano remains significant as it acknowledged the rights of women to equality and dignity, especially in matters matrimonial. Despite Shah Bano’s subsequent withdrawal of her maintenance plea, the case still illustrates India’s continued tension between constitutional values, personal laws, and women’s justice.

Also Read: 5 Times Samantha and Raj Spotted Together: When Are They Making It Official?

Share

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
•