In a remarkable legal decision, the Supreme Court of India has directed an IPS officer to issue an unconditional public apology to her ex-husband and his family. This decision comes after a long and contentious divorce battle involving serious accusations, including domestic violence, attempted murder, and rape. The couple, married in 2015, separated in 2018. And after years of legal battles, the Supreme Court stepped in to end the bitter feud.
The Supreme Court has ordered the IPS officer to apologize to her ex-husband’s family. She must publish the apology in national newspapers and across social media within three days. The apology will appear in both English and Hindi papers.
The Court stated that the apology is needed as moral restitution for the “physical and mental trauma” caused by the long legal battle. The husband and his father spent time in jail due to false allegations. The husband spent 109 days in prison, and his father 103 days.
The woman’s apology is not just an expression of regret but also a call for closure. She acknowledged the emotional scars that have resulted from the prolonged legal battle and expressed hope that her public apology would help bring peace and healing. The apology also includes an invitation to the ex-husband’s family to meet their daughter, who is a minor.
The apology format, prescribed by the Court, emphasizes that it should not be altered in any manner. It reads, “I sincerely apologise on behalf of my parents for any of my actions that may have caused hurt or trauma…” The Court also ensured that this apology would not be used against the woman in any future legal proceedings.
Also Read Happy Birthday Suriya: A Look at His Love Story with Jyothika
The Court dissolved the marriage and quashed all 30 criminal and civil cases. The minor daughter will stay with her mother, but the father gets supervised visitation. The Court also supported the Allahabad High Court’s 2022 ruling to curb the misuse of Section 498A. It requires a family welfare committee to review complaints before any action. This judgment highlights the need for moral restitution and the judiciary’s role in helping families find closure.