Bigtvlive English

BigTV తెలుగు

What Is the Dharmasthala Mass Burial Case? Full Details Inside

What Is the Dharmasthala Mass Burial Case? Full Details Inside

Dharmasthala Mass Burial Case: Authorities recovered several female bodies without proper clothing. Examiners noted visible injuries and other signs suggesting physical harm. On June 3, a former sanitation worker from Dharmasthala, Karnataka, filed a complaint. He reported that over 100 women, including students, died under suspicious circumstances and were later buried. He submitted photographs of skeletal remains to support his account.


A week later, the worker appeared in court under police protection. Officers covered his entire body, leaving only a transparent strip over his eyes. The former sanitation worker testified about the details in his letter. The worker explained that between 1998 and 2014, his superiors instructed him to dispose of more than a hundred deceased individuals. He noted that many of the victims were women who showed signs of physical trauma before their deaths.

Witness Testimony:


His testimony, backed by photographic evidence, drew public attention to long-concealed events. He stated that activists and victims’ families had tried to raise awareness for years but received little response. He pointed out that a powerful family controlled the Lord Manjunatha shrine in Dharmasthala. In his complaint, he alleged that members of the temple management either played a role in or maintained connections to the individuals involved.

Dharmasthala, located in Karnataka, serves as a major pilgrimage site visited by people across India. The temple board employed the sanitation worker during the period mentioned in his testimony.

Truth Revealed in 2012?

The 2012 Sowjanya case revealed serious concerns in Dharmasthala. The sanitation worker’s recent statements reignited demands for a thorough investigation. Two senior advocates formally backed the call for a fair and independent inquiry into the reported mass burials in Dharmasthala. Their support strengthened the push for forming a Special Investigation Team (SIT).

The family of Ananya Bhat, a first-year MBBS student who disappeared in 2003 during a college trip to Dharmasthala, renewed their pursuit of justice. On July 15, Sujatha, Ananya’s 60-year-old mother and a former CBI stenographer, filed a fresh complaint at the Dharmasthala Police Station. Believing that her daughter could be one of the unidentified individuals mentioned in the sanitation worker’s testimony, Sujatha intensified the demand for an SIT probe into the reported burial sites in Dharmasthala.

Also Read: TN Heavy Rains in 10 Districts; Orange Alert Issued

Buried School Girls?

A Dalit sanitation worker worked for the Dharmasthala temple administration from 1995 to 2014. On July 3, he filed a complaint with the Dharmasthala police. He stated that his superiors regularly ordered him to bury or burn the remains of several individuals. He identified many of them as women and children and described their condition as a result of long-term mistreatment spanning nearly two decades.

He said his superiors often threatened him when he hesitated to follow instructions. They warned him with statements like, “We will cut you into pieces; your body will be buried like the rest.” He described how he buried some remains along the Netravathi River. He believed the perpetrators chose the riverbanks because the soft, damp soil helped hide the remains by speeding up decomposition. The worker recalled an incident from 2010 involving the burial of a schoolgirl between the ages of 12 and 15. He said he buried her body near a petrol station in Kalleri. Media reports later noted that she wore a school uniform, though parts of it were missing. The reports also described physical injuries on the body.

Also Read: IRCTC Good News: New Daily Train Service from Hyderabad

How did this case get opened?

In December 2014, a sanitation worker fled Dharmasthala overnight after someone associated with his supervisors allegedly harmed a young child in his family. Years later, he emerged from hiding in neighboring states. He said deep shame and a renewed commitment to seek justice motivated his return.

To support his claims, he unearthed skeletal remains and submitted photographs, his Aadhaar card, and an old employee ID to the police. He urged the authorities to hold proper funerals for the recovered bodies. He believed this act would honor the deceased and help ease his long-standing guilt.

He agreed to assist with the investigation and requested protection under the Witness Protection Act, 2018. He also alleged that the incidents involved the temple administration and several influential figures.

Also Read: Ahaan Panday’s Fee for Saiyaara Revealed

Related News

Why Lalbaugcha Ganesh Makes a Stop at Masjid Every Visarjan?

Camel Urine as Traditional Medicine: Facts and Science

IIT Hyderabad Enters the Top 7 IITs: Locals React

Actor Channels Orry at Kerala Secretariat Onam Event?

GST 2.0 New Prices: 5 Credit Cards to Boost Your Savings

Tata Harrier EV Ad Featuring Pothole-Filled Road Sparks Online Debate

Bengaluru Couple Spends ₹5.9 Lakh in One Month — Internet Shocked

×