Pakistan’s recent nuclear threats to India have raised an eyebrow over stability in the region. And the consequences that come with such aggressive showmanship. In as much as the tensions remained high, the use of nuclear bluff by Pakistan seems more strategic desperation than going to war. Now, Pakistan’s Nuclear threat against India is successfully decoded.
The Risks of Brinkmanship using Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear blackmail at the bargaining table is a desperate action and has unintended outcomes. Even though Pakistan has traditionally employed nuclear capability as a counterweight, experts opine that to threaten using the nuclear card. This reflects home trouble in terms of economic emergencies, political instability, and strains in the army. It is typically employed as a strategy to divert attention away from homegrown issues and invoke nationalist fervor.
India too has played safe in her nuclear policy by sticking to the no-first-use doctrine. And expecting diplomatic measures rather than aggression. India has taken care to uphold her sovereignty by playing safe in reply so that an escalation to further conflict was avoided. Nuclear aggression, on the other hand, would invite stiff determination by displaying the Indian military readiness and strategic acumen.
Sources says, ”Pakistan’s army lacks India’s conventional superiority in terms of scale, advanced weaponry such as S-400 systems or even the economic strength. In such a scenario, nuclear threats act as a great equaliser, deterring India from exploiting this imbalance.”
Most analysts have assumed that Pakistani nuclear threats are political, not operational. Under the period of economic austerity and strained foreign relations, such a policy would be used in an effort. To divert attention from rising domestic chaos and consolidate domestic constituencies. By resorting to such threats’ exaggeration, the Pakistan authorities seek to attempt regaining leadership. Especially of security discourse on the world stage in South Asia.
The reckless nuclear bluster increases the likelihood of miscalculation, and thus international diplomatic intervention is necessary. Interested countries in the peace of South Asia need to discourage provocative words. And promote talks so that there is no unwanted escalation. The world has to see that nuclear capability is kept at arm’s length as a deterrent and never as a political instrument.
“Escalating tensions with India create a rally-around-the-flag effect. The Pahalgam attack, linked to the Pakistan Army and ISI via a former commando of the Pak army and encrypted Chinese telecom equipment. They suggests Pakistan’s use of proxies like Lashkar-e-Toiba to destabilise Kashmir,” elaborated sources.
“Nuclear threats signal to Beijing that Islamabad remains a critical ally against India. By framing Kashmir as an Islamic cause, Pakistan seeks solidarity from Gulf states and Turkey, leveraging pan-Islamist narratives to offset isolation. The Pahalgam attack, ISI’s role in shielding groups like LeT and its shadow group responsible for Pahalgam, The Resistance Front (TRF). And links to global terrorism such as the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad hideout fall into the definition of a rogue state…AQ Khan’s nuclear network. Which is a supplier for Iran, North Korea, and the recent threats to sell nukes to other rogue states clearly suggest Pakistan’s disregard for non-proliferation norms”. Said the sources hinting on the possible jokes behind the serious nuclear threats.
Strength vs. Desperation
Pakistan’s nuclear threats to India are an indication of desperation, rather than strategy. Since India is committed to peace and stability, it is willing to nullify any threat or intimidation. The world needs to realize that diplomatic solutions, rather than irresponsible threats, are the key to a secure and stable future.
ALSO READ: Twisted Statements on Indo-Pak Ceasefire Violations: What’s Happening?
Share
Ram Charan Unveils Wax Statue, Pooch Joins
AP Govt to Issue New Ration Cards by June – Here's How to Apply
