12 Crore Alimony Demand: In resolving an eight-year marriage dispute, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a LinkedIn page cannot be used as evidence of income to award alimony. The court denied her requests for ₹12 crore, a BMW, and other compensation, but it did offer her an apartment in Mumbai as alimony.

The top court ruled that, in light of a previous settlement that the parties had reached, the wife’s claims were unreasonable and unfounded. According to a report by Bar and Bench, the case received a lot of attention as the wife requested ₹12 crore and a Mumbai apartment from her separated husband.

The Court dismissed the wife’s use of the husband’s LinkedIn profile as reliable proof that he was still receiving a large salary.

What is the court statement?
The court made it clear that “we refuse to place any reliance on the ‘LinkedIn’ profile” when dismissing the woman’s supplemental alimony claim. The husband’s income had drastically decreased, the court noted. According to the report, his yearly salary at Citibank dropped from over ₹2.5 crore to less than ₹18 lakh in recent years, and the Court recognized that he was no longer working there.

The newspaper cited the Court as saying, “We find no reason to disbelieve the appellant’s contention that he is no longer employed with Citibank.”

It stated that the wife accepted a Mumbai apartment and two parking spaces as part of a thorough amicable settlement arrangement made in 2022. She didn’t ask for further maintenance or claim ₹12 crore at that time.

Also Read: How DMart Sells So Cheap: The Simple Business Trick

The Court further stated, “The respondent had no such claim when entering into a settlement concerning permanent alimony.” The Supreme Court also recognized the wife’s work experience and educational background, concluding that she didn’t need continuous financial assistance.

It said, “Even at the time of the estrangement, the respondent-wife was working and is a graduate engineer with a post-graduate degree in management.”

What did the Husband agree to give?
Her husband had promised to give her a flat with two parking spots in Mumbai’s Kalpataru Habitat. Along with the house, he is going to settle 25.9 lakhs in housing dues. According to the Court, this was a reasonable arrangement. According to the Court, “the appellant’s gift of the aforementioned property to the respondent would reasonably take care of the respondent-wife even after divorce.”

Share

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
•