Rashmika Mandanna on Vijay Devarakonda: Rashmika Mandanna recently found herself at the center of social media backlash after making a statement during a promotional event that stirred debate. When asked if she would consider dating someone like Ranbir Kapoor’s character in Animal a deeply flawed and violent individual—Rashmika replied that “people can grow for love” and that partners often influence each other over time. Her statement, which seemed to suggest that even troubled personalities could evolve in a relationship, did not sit well with many fans.
What made the comment even more intriguing was the perceived connection to Vijay Deverakonda, who is often linked with Rashmika both professionally and personally. Fans were quick to point out the similarity between Ranbir’s Animal character and Vijay’s controversial role in Arjun Reddy. Both characters were criticized for promoting toxic masculinity and abusive behavior under the guise of intense love.
Rashmika’s response appeared to some as a subtle nod to her rumored relationship with Vijay. Given her past praise for Arjun Reddy and its portrayal of flawed love, audiences speculated whether her statement was unintentionally reflective of her own personal experiences.
Social media users, particularly women, were vocal in expressing disappointment. Critics argued that normalizing such problematic behavior, even in fictional relationships, sends the wrong message, especially when it comes from influential celebrities. While some defended Rashmika’s intent, suggesting she meant to highlight emotional growth in relationships, others called for more responsibility in public comments.
Also Read: Rashmika Mandanna’s Secret Career Wish Before Acting Will Blow Your Mind
Rashmika Mandanna on Vijay Devarakonda: The incident reignites discussions on the thin line between portraying complex characters and glorifying toxicity. While Rashmika’s words may have been rooted in idealism about love’s power to heal, it also reminded many that public figures need to tread carefully when interpreting sensitive subjects, especially ones that blur fiction and reality.